Paper 1 question 2
This extract is a letter about happiness, written by Richard Brandson. It is in a letter format which means it starts off with a greeting “Dear” and then followed by short paragraphs. The first paragraph is a short introduction paragraph in which Brandson addresses the audience by saying “You don’t know me but”. This addresses the audience by targeting them directly and speaking to them rather than talking to a larger audience.
Throughout the letter, Brandson keeps an informal tone by writing in the first person and constantly using “I” and often referring back to his past where he has dealt with the topic he is speaking about. The author seems to use examples of what brings him happiness or examples from his life to back up the points he makes. By having some evidence from his own life, it makes the writing stronger and could be seen as more convincing because if it is working well for Brandon, then maybe it will work for me.
This extract is structured like an average letter, begins with a greeting, has a couple paragraphs, and ends with a sign off. Majority of the paragraphs in the extract are about five sentences and either have claims, strong points, or quotes to back up the claims. The author writes one paragraph which is noticeably smaller than the others; “Stop and breathe. Be healthy. Be around your friends and family. Be there for someone, and let someone be there for you. Be bold. Just be for a minute.” This is one of Brandson’s most prominent points and is telling the reader that everything is going to be ok and to take a step back and breathe.
Throughout the letter, Brandson keeps the writing in the first person. The author often relates back to himself and references his life in order to give advice for the audience. “It’s OK to be stressed, scared and sad, I certainly have been throughout my 66 years.” Branson uses lots of imagery to help give the audience an idea of what happiness is for him and could be similar things for them. For example, the author writes, “debates. It’s the smile on a stranger's face, the smell of rain, the ripple of a wave, the wind across the sand.”
To strengthen the author's point in the importance of taking a moment to breathe, the author adds a “why?” at the end of a paragraph that he then answers immediately after. “Because allowing yourself just to be puts things into perspective. Try it. Be still. Be present.” It not only strengthens the point that the author is trying to make, but the short sentences like “Try it.” and “Be present.” creates a sense of importance and that it might be worth your while to listen to what the author says.
Although the letter isn’t formal, it is in a mostly professional tone. The only part that isn’t in a professional tone is when the author starts to brag “I know I’m fortunate to live an extraordinary life…” but then he disclaims that by saying “I am successful, wealthy and connected because I am happy.” The author almost sounds self centered if the writing was taken out of context, but in context, the author is trying to show that yes, he is a rich, successful and happy person, but before he was rich and successful, he made sure to be happy first.
The author uses a hyperbole to strengthen his point and back up his reasoning. “There’s a reason we’re called human beings and not human doings.” Although we are called human beings due to the latin roots, it doesn’t literally mean because we are constantly doing things.
AO1: You had a detailed understanding of the text and also had effective references to the characteristic features.
ReplyDeleteAO3:Your analysis is clear, coherent, and well structured having many small paragraphs. However, to improve your analysis try using smaller quotes in order to make it more precise. You can do this by using ellipsis. Other than that you did great and had detailed awareness of the writer's stylistic choices. You also were detailed when linking evidence and explanatory comments. Overall great job 20/25
AO1 - I think you had a clear understanding of context, audience, and meaning however i do not think it was super detailed i think you could have done a bit better job of explaining your points a little bit more but fore the most part good job. 3 marks
ReplyDeleteAO3
I think that your analysis was detailed with valid point but not so much explanation but you did have clear detailed awareness of the writers linguistic choices aswell as using quotes you did have alot of quotes so that was good aswell. I would give you 16 marks because most of your stuff was well written.
19 total
AO1) There is a detailed understanding of the text and it is seen with the references to the text. The quotations and elaboration on the quotes are an example of the understanding. There is an effective reference to characteristic features. 4 marks
ReplyDeleteAO3) The analysis was detailed with very few errors. The content is relevant as well. The comparative analysis of elements of form, structure, and language ate clear. The abundance of quotes with the well written response is great. 8 marks
12 marks